Tingkat Infeksi Hymenolepis Sp pada Itik di Pemotongan Unggas Karang Semut, Yogyakarta
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Itik di Indonesia umumnya dipelihara semi intensif, yaitu dilakukan pengumbaran atau penggembalaan pada waktu tertentu di area persawahan kemudian kembali ke kandang halaman belakang rumah penduduk diberikan pakan tambahan. Hal itu memacu adanya kecacingan pada itik. Penyakit yang disebabkan oleh cacing atau parasit menjadi ancaman yang parah dan dapat mengakibatkan kematian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat infeksi Hymenolepis sp pada itik yang ada di pemotongan unggas. Sampel yang digunakan penelitian ini adalah 20 itik lokal afkir diperiksa pada saluran gastrointestinal setelah dilakukan penyembelihan. Data hasil dianalisis menggunakan metode diskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat infeksi Hymenolepis sp sebesar 35% pada itik lokal afkir. Intensitas infeksi yang ditemukan sebanyak 36 cacing. Cacing tersebut seluruhnya ditemukan pada usus besar. Hal ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa tingkat infeksi Hymenolepis sp sebesar 35% pada itik lokal afkir.
Kata kunci: itik, parasit, Hymenolepis sp
ABSTRACT
Ducks in Indonesia are generally kept in a semi-intensive system, which is carried out by free-range at certain times in rice fields and then returning to the backyard cages of residents' homes given additional feed. This spurred the presence of worms in the ducks. Diseases caused by worms or parasites pose a serious threat and can result in death. The aim of this study was to determine the level of infection of Hymenolepis sp in ducks that were slaughtered for poultry. The samples used in this study were 20 local ducks which were examined in the gastrointestinal tract after slaughter. The results of data analysis using a descriptive method. The results showed that the infection rate of Hymenolepis sp was 35% in rejected local ducks. The intensity of infection found was 36 worms. The worms are found entirely in the large intestine. It can be concluded that the infection rate Hymenolepis sp by 35% in local ducks rejected.
Keywords: duck, parasite, Hymenolepis sp
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Reksohadiprodjo, Sukanto. 1995. Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Edisi Pertama. BPFE-Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
W. A. Ramadhana, D. Sunarti, dan T.A. Sarjana. 2018. Produksi Karkas dan Persentase Lemak Abdominal Itik Tegal Jantan dengan Sistem Pemeliharaan Intensif dan Semi Intensif di Ktt Bulusari Pemalang. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 7(1): 173 - 179.
Nnadi PA, George SO (2010). A Cross— Sectional Survey on Parasites of Chickens in Selected Villages in the Subhumid Zones of South—Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Parasitology Research. 10: 1418—1426.
Kaufmann,J., 1996. Parasitic Infections of Domestic Animals.BirkhauserVerlag. Germany. 350- 366
Anne, F. 2006. Parasite Management for Natural and Organic Poultry: Coccidiosis 1—800—346—9140. www.attra.ncat.org
Paul, B.T., J.R. Lawal., E.F. Ejeh., J.J. Ndahi., I.D. Peter., A.M. Bello., and Y. Wakil. 2015. Survey of Helminth Parasites of Free Range Muscovy Ducks (Anas Platyrynchos) Slaughtered in Gombe, North Eastern Nigeria. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 14.
Latham, A.D.M. dan Poulin. R (2002). New Record of Gastrointestinal Helminths from the Southern Black- backed Gull (Larus dominicanus) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoologi. 29: 253-257
Yamaguti, S. 1961. Systema Helminthum. Vol. I, Part I, Interscience Publishers, Inc. New York, pp 782-785.
Soulsby, E.J.L. 1982. Textbook of Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, Vol. I. Helminths. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Oka, I. B. M., dan Dwinata, I. M. 2014. Pararit Cacing Pita (Cestoda) pada Itik Lokal Bali (Anas sp) yang dipasarkan di Pasar Badung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional "Aplikasi Teknologi Molekuler Dalam Peningkatan Produktivitas dan Kesehatan Hewan".
Jyotymol, G., K. Syamala. M.N. Priya, C.K. Deepa, K.G. Ajithkumar, A.J. George, dan R. Ravindran (2012). A Report on the Occurance of Hymenolepis anatina in Ducks under Backyard System. J. Ind. Vet. Assoc. Kerala. 10(3): 57.
Wehr EE. 1972. Disease of Poultry. Hofstad MS, Cal- nek BW, Helmboldt CF, Reid WM, Yoder HW, edi- tor. Iowa (US): The Iowa State University Press.
Fischer. M.S dan Say. R.R. 1989. Manual of Tropical Vet- erinary Parasitology. Oxford (UK): CAB international.
Bhownik MK, Sinha PK. 1983. Studies on the Pathology of Taeniasis in domestic fowl. Indian Veterinary Journal. 60: 6-8.
Dar JA, Tanveer S. 2013. Prevalence of cestode para- sites in free-range backyard chickens (Gallus gal- lus domesticus) of Kashmir, India. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 4(1): 67-70. doi:10.5251/abjna.2013.4.1.67.70.
Kusuma, S.B., Suluh N., Aan A., Yendri J., Tutik L. A. 2020. Identifikasi keragaman jenis parasit cacing pada ternak ayam kampung di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Terapan 4 (2):71-77
Slimane, Badreddine Ben. 2016. Prevalence of the Gastro-Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Chicken Gallus Domesticus Linnaeus, 1758 in Tunisia According to the Agro-Ecological Zones. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 40(3):774—778.
Dakpogan, Hervé Brice, Venant Pascal Houndonougbo, Serge Mensah, Toussaint Hagbe, Grégoire Tchodo, Armand Bienvenu Gbangboche, Frédéric Houndonougbo, and Christophe Chrysostome. 2019. “Chicken Gastrointestinal Nematode and Coccidia Prevalence in Abomey-Calavi District, Benin.” International Journal of Biosciences 6655:363—69.
Iboh, Cletus Inah. 2019. “Investigation of Gastrointestinal Parasites of Local Chickens (Gallus Domesticus) in Ugep, Yakurr Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria.” South Asian Journal of Parasitology 2(3):1—5.
Jaiswal, Kamal, Suman Mishra, and Anjum Bee. 2020. “Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminth Parasites in Gallus Gallus Domesticus in Lucknow, U. P, India. Advances in Zoology and Botany 8(5):422-430.
Uhuo, A. C., F. C. Okafor, O. O. Odikamnoro, C. S. Onwe, M. C. Abarike, and J. Elom. 2013. “Common Gastrointestinal Parasites of Local Chicken (Gallus Domesticus) Slaughtered in Some Selected Eatery Centres in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State: Implication for Meat Qualit.” International Journal of Development and Sustainability 2(2):1416—22.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.