STUDI PENELUSURAN TUGAS DAN KINERJA ALUMNI STPP MAGELANG JURUSAN PENYULUHAN PERTANIAN YOGYAKARTA (THE TRACER STUDY OF THE STPP MAGELANG GRADUATES TASKS AND PERFORMANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PROGRAM STUDY)
Abstract
This study aimed at revealing the graduates working as Agricultural Extension Workers (AEWs), graduate performance condition, and the correlation between the performance and Cummulative Achievement Index (CAI). This study was descriptive in nature involving the graduates as objects, and the respondents i.e. the graduate leaders, the graduate partnerships, and farmer group leaders. The data collected by questioner and documentation methods, and analyzed by descriptive technique and Kendall’s Tau Correlation Test. The result of studies are as follows, (1) 50% of all the graduates worked as AEWs, (2) the graduates job performance falls into the successful category, especially the action aspect is in the “mostly successful” category, (3) the graduates attitude is in the “best” category, especially the enthusiasm aspect is in the “good” category, (4) there is significant correlation between the graduates job performance and Cummulative Achievement Index (CAI), and (5) ) there is no significant correlation between the graduates attitude performance and Cummulative Achievement Index (CAI). This implies that there is a need of evaluation and development of the curriculum, and partnership between STPP and stakeholders so that the curriculum is relevant and applicable to the graduate’s job descriptions as AEWs.
Keywords: tracer study, job, attitude.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anonim. 2007. Indikator Kinerja. Diambil dari internet pada tanggal 15 September 2007 dari: http://www.kmpk.ugm.ac.id/data/ SPMKK/6dINDIKATOR%20KINERJA
Badan Pengembangan SDM Pertanian. 2002. Kebijakan nasional penyelenggaraan penyuluhan pertanian. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta.
Ding, Cody. S. 2001. Profile analysis: Multidimensional scaling approach. Diambil dari internet pada tangga 20 September 2007 dari: http://www. pareonline,net/ getvn.asp?v=7&n=16
Finch, Curtis R. and Crunkilton, J.R. 1979. Curriculum Development in Vocationa-land Technical Education. Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Boston.
Gibson, James, L.John M, Ivancevich dan James H. Donnelly, Jr. 1996. Organisasi : Perilaku, Struktur, Proses, Binarupa Aksara. Jilid I. Diterjemahkan oleh : Nunuk Adiarni, Edisi Kedelapan, Jakarta.
Katz, Jacqueline M. and Green, Eleanor. 1997. Managing Quality, A Guide System Wide Performance Management in Health Care. Mosby Year Book.
Luneto, R.N. 1998. Kinerja Bappeda Tingkat II dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Tahunan Daerah (Tesis). Program Pascasarjana, UGM. Yogyakarta.
Marzuki, S. 1994. Dasar-dasar Penyuluhan Pertanian. Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta.
Moh. As’ad. 1991. Psikologi Industri. Ed. Library.Yogyakarta. P. 47- 48.
Nasir, M. 1988. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory (Second edition). Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited. New Delhi.
Pucel, David J. 1979. Longitudinal Methods as Toolsfor Evaluating Vocational Education. NCRVE. Columbus, Ohio.
Pusat Permbinaan Penyuluhan Pertanian. 2000. Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 41.1/Kpts/OT.210/2/2000 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pelaksanaan Jabatan Fungsional Penyuluh Pertanian dan Angka Kreditnya. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta.
STPP Jurusan Penyuluhan Pertanian Yogyakarta 2003. Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Program Diploma IV. STPP Jurusan Penyuluhan Pertanian Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Suhardiyono, L. 1990. Penyuluhan: Petunjuk bagi Penyuluh Petanian. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Sugiyono, 2003. Statistik untuk Penelitian (Cetakan ke lima). Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55259/jiip.v4i2.350
View My Stats